Home>Products & Solution>MC Square>What is MC Square>Theoretical background
What is MC Square
Product Concept
Theoretical background
Supporting reference
Products
Why do we need MC        Square
Scientific research
Commentary
Contact us



Excerpt from ¡°Experiment on the effect of the learning program of MC Square¡± 1994 (Prof. In-Jae, Lim and 3 others from Institute of Education Research at Seoul National University)

  Studying something was traditionally believed to be prompted by ¡°repeated practices and concentration¡±. It was proven by the experiment on the effect of memory advancement by W. James and by the experiment on the effect of memorization by Ebbinghaus. Also it focuses on ¡°repetition and practice¡± in functionalism and behaviorism the 5 laws of learning by Thorndike and ¡°meaning acquisition through insight ¡± in behaviorism.

 
Efforts to explain, Brain psychological dimension continue to gradually increase. The first attempt at this research began with D.O. Hebb as he tried to explain phenomenons related to activities of cerebral cortex. (Hergenhahn,1988, pp338-423). Hebb insisted that intelligence and perception were learned through experience and not from birth as those researchers, believing in innateness, had thought. According to him, people are born with a randomly interconnected neuropil and in the course of a person¡¯s lifetime these sense experiences can be organized and interact effectively with outer experiences. Hebb separated learning into two parts (childhood
and adulthood) and tried to explain this with the concept of cellular aggregateness and aspects order. Cellular aggregateness and aspect order (continual activities of provisionally interconnected celluar aggregateness) is well formed with diverse stimulations in the childhood period, then in the adulthood period by recompositioning the aspect order a more creative and cognitive learning can be achieved. In his theory, learning at childhood becomes the framework for later learning. Therefore, it is very important to have an abundance of experiences at an earlier age.

 
Relation between stimulation level and cognitive function is to be explained in a way of RAS Arousal theory Hergenhahn, 1988, pp401-402). RAS (reticular activation system) is located between above spinal cord and below hypothalamus size of a finger and is related to sleeping, concern, and emotional behaviors. Next, arousal or arousing function along with cue fuction is 2 major functions of neural impulse and means that through collateral produced in sense passageway from spinal cord to RAS (hypothalamus) sense impulse increases RAS activities. Consequently, activation of RAS is an index of arousing function so vigorous activities represent high
level of arousing function.It is important for RAS to reach proper level of arousing function in order to maximize guide of cue function of stimulation in the relation between arousing level and execution. If arousing level is too low, then sense information cannot be used; in contrast, if it is too high, too much information is analyzed in cortex, which will occur complication and strange behaviors. Therefore, for the most suitable cortex fuction it is important to have proper level of arousal.

 
LPT stimulates certain parts of the brain to expand or to increase the activities of cerebrum such as memory, learning ability, or creativity, stability. In detail, disposition exists in the central nervous system to store information and it shifts the efficiency of synapse, which means that by strengthening the connections of synapse, the memory ability can be enhanced. The amount of learning is related to the quantity of changes of synapse within activated neuropil. It represents the relation between learning and LPT.
The strength of memory while acquiring information (memory) and long after this time depends on the quantity of synapse changes in
the pertinent neuropil. It represents the relation between olivion and a weakened LPT. Therefore, it becomes obvious that there is a correlation between LPT and forming memory.